The British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) has hardly treated itself in glory about his report on race, faith and conflict.
Whether it refers to Black Lives Matter (BLM) protests in June 2020 as “largely peaceful” anti-racist demonstrations after dozens of police officers were injured by violent demonstrators, or the broadcasting of a documentary that is a narrator is a terraist kingdom of Hamas-Het-a-a-a-one-a-one-oo-ear civilian-ear-ear-ear-ear-ear-ear-ear-ear-ear-ear-ear-ear East-ear-ear-ear-ear-ear-ear ears Remained.
The newest scandal to rock our national broadcaster was an article aimed at Eid al-Fitr-the Islamic celebration that consistently marks the end of Ramadan that used the term “recovery” without quotation marks.
In default permanent duty for transparency, there was no detailed explanation about what “returns” in the piece – where the BBC now removed the term from the head and the other cases where it was used outside of an interviewee.
The theological basis for the term “return” stems from the Islamic conviction that all people are born with a congenital concept of the unity of God and a natural tendency to submit to Allah.
In other words, the concept is that all people are born Muslim what means that atheists and people with non-Islamic religious preferences have strayed from the “just path”.
That is why converts are considered to “return” to Islam, because they believe that they “return” to their original state of submission to Allah.
Although “new Muslim” can be used as an alternative sense for such converts, it can be considered indigestible by some Muslims who believe that it does not capture the theological essence of “reversal”.
However, it is worth acknowledging that the term 'return' does not recommend universal support among Muslims, in which Dr. Taj Hargey of the Oxford Institute for British Islam says that the term 'should never be used' and that the correct term to be used is 'convert'.
The point here is that, regardless of a person's views on the central principles of Islam, the BBC – and those who are employed – has a professional obligation to produce content that is respectful for the fact that it is the national public broadcaster of a nominal Christian, fast secularizing and religious diverse society.
Modern Great Britain includes people who are proud of their Islamic faith, and those who are proud of their Christian, Hindu, Sikh, Jewish and Buddhist religions and identities, as well as an ever-growing and important population who has no religious conviction at all.
The Islamic ideological doctrine may not be presented as a fact by a temporary employment service funded by the taxpayer in the VK and This principle must apply to any religious faith system, including the conviction of the belief that the Gods exist.
In a state-funded organization, which is probably dedicated to balance and impartiality, non-Muslims who decide to accept Islam must be called “converts”.
It is a pity that nobody involved no worries with the BBC involved in the publication of the controversial piece in question – the writer, editors, service managers or main product.
Despite all its supposed emphasis on the “progressive” three unit of diversity, fairness and inclusion, our national broadcaster reveals all too often that it cannot be trusted to approach modern Great -Britain with care, sensitivity and consideration.
Expand your horizon with award -winning British journalism. Try De Telegraaf for free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award -winning website, exclusive app, money -saving offers and more.
