News organizations will soon start looking for Chatgpt logbooks
The clock is ticking and so far, OpenAI has not provided official updates since a blog post of 5 June with details about which chatgpt users are affected.
Although it is clear that OpenAI is and will be retained, it would be impossible for the New York Times or a news -requirement to search all that data.
Instead, only a small sample of the data is probably accessible, based on keywords that OpenAi and news -requirements agree. That data remains on the Servers of OpenAi, where it is made anonymous, and it will probably never be produced directly to the claimants.
Both parties negotiate the exact process for searching via the chatlogs, where both parties seem to be hoping to minimize the time that the chat logs are stored.
For OpenAI, sharing the logs risks that reveal cases of infringing output that can further worry the damage in the case. The logs can also reveal how often the output attributes incorrect information to New Seaters.
But for news claimants, access to the logs is not considered the key to their business – perhaps giving additional examples of copying – but news organizations can help claim that Chatgpt weakens the market for their content. That could weigh against the argument of reasonable use, as a judge in a recent judgment believed that proof of market dilution could give an AI authentic court in favor of claimants.
Jay Edelson, a prominent lawyer for the privacy of consumers, said Ars that he is worried that judges do not seem to consider any evidence in the chatgpt logs not at all “the case of the news claimants” improve “, while they really change a product that people use every day.”
Edelson warned that OpenAi itself probably has better security than most companies to protect against a potential data breach that could expose this private chat logs. But “lawyers have been notoir pretty bad about securing data,” Edelson suggested, so “the idea that you have a lot of lawyers who are going to do what they are” with “some of the most sensitive data on the planet” and “those who protect it against hackers should make everyone uncomfortable.”
