Skip to content

Jared Isaacman speaks out and it is clear that NASA has lost a visionary leader

    “There is now enough hardware to fly a few missions and make sure that your China goes back to the moon,” he said. 'But you can't be stuck here forever. This is literally the equality of the way of P-51 Mustangs [a fighter aircraft] From the Second World War and they use in Desert Storm, because we have to keep the plants open. And that is clearly no logical meaning. “

    About his De Nomination

    Isaacman said he is political, although he leans to the right. He supports Trump's wish to reduce alleged waste and fraud of the US government, and that is what he was planning to do at NASA. He also did not blame Trump for his departure and said that a president makes a thousand decisions a day, often with a few seconds of information.

    He also said that he enjoyed the Senate's confirmation process, so that he could frankly discuss his positions on NASA with individual American senators.

    As for why he was removed, Isaacman said the following: “I had a pretty good idea, I don't think the timing was a lot of coincidence,” he said. “Of course there was more than one departure that was treated on that day.”

    The phone call to Isaacman that was drawn to his nomination came on the same day that the founder of SpaceX Elon Musk left his position as a special adviser to the president. Musk was supported for the nomination of Isaacman. In his time that the Ministry of Efficiency ran from the government, however, Musk had made enemies within the US government.

    “There were some people who had a few axes to grind, and I was a good, visible target,” said Isaacman. “I want to be overwhelmingly clear: I have no mistake the president.”

    Although Isaacman did not mention anyone, several sources told Ars that it was Sergio Gor, an official in the White House Presidential Staff Office, who had moved against Isaacman after Musk left the White House. Gor was irritated by the failure of Musk to consult him and other personnel officers about some decisions.

    As a result of what seems to be political smallness, NASA lost a visionary leader who had the potential to lead the space agency to the mid -21st century at a time when aging has to modernize. If you listen to him, losing that potential is downright painful in such a way. It's a damn unfortunate.