Skip to content

How the Columbia River Treaty became entangled in the feud of Trump with Canada

    In the tariff pole between the United States and Canada, there is a little known treaty that forms the life of millions of Americans and Canadians.

    The 60-year Convention rules the water that runs along the Columbia River, which winds from British Columbia through Montana, Idaho, Washington and Oregon and offers the largest source of hydropower in the United States. But parts of the treaty are around the US presidential election.

    Negotiators were still weeks away from completing the details of an updated version of the Convention when President Joseph R. Biden Jr. ended. Then a decade of conversations against the hostility of President Trump opposed Canada. He called Canada the '51st state', set rates on Canadian export and fixed on tapping his water as a 'very large tap'.

    In a controversial call in February with the Canadian Prime Minister at the time, Justin Trudeau, Mr Trump took the treaty under the ways he said that Canada had used the United States. The implication was clear: the treaty could become a negotiating ship in a broader negotiation to make the relationship between the two provinces again.

    Prime Minister Mark Carney and Mr. Trump rejected the heat during their meeting in the White House last week. But the Trump government has even made treaties with benefits for both parties as a negotiation on the edge of a knife. Mr. Trump's whimsical trade policy has thrown uncertainty in the future of the Pacific Northwest, which creates new concerns around everything, from electricity to flood control.

    Data centers that flows the internet and the artificial intelligence of electricity running from the power of the Columbia River. Twilight Soccer Games Duke It Out in Riverfront Parks funded by local dams. Irrigation of his reservoirs supplies water to rolling hectares of pink lady and gala apple orchards. Coordinated dams stop floods in Portland, Ore., And elsewhere.

    Mr. Trump touched a raw nerve among Canadians, who for a long time are concerned that the United States – in particular water – as they plunder. “They want our country, they want our resources, they want our water, they want our country,” was a mantra that Mr. Carney repeated for Prime Minister during his successful run.

    “The Canadians feel such a sense of betrayal,” said Jay Inslee, until recently the Governor of Washington, in an interview. The treaty connects a complicated web of cultural and economic interests. “It is not easy to negotiate about that,” said Mr. Insleigh, “and it makes it much more difficult when the man thinks you are a snake in the grass.”

    A spokesperson for British Columbia said that there was no “only movement” since the US Department of Foreign Affairs paused negotiations as part of a broad evaluation of the country's international obligations. Although that is typical after a change in administration, “that sounds like a strange euphemism for what is going on,” said Adrian Dix, the Minister of Energy of the Province, in March nearly 600 people in a virtual town hall.

    Mr Dix said that the local residents had pulled him aside on the Save-on-Foods market to ask if Canada should withdraw completely from the treaty. “This is visceral for the people of the Columbia Basin,” he said. “This is part of their lives and histories and souls.”

    If the Pact would blow up, the United States would expect that it would “be more difficult to control and predict the production of hydrumers” and to increase the uncertainty in preventing flooding in the Pacific Northwest, according to a non -party -bound conference report. The electricity needs of the region can double in the next two decades, according to new estimates from an Interstate Power Council.

    The Ministry of Foreign Affairs refused to comment.

    The roots of the treaty date from Memorial Day in 1948. After a heavy spring rain, a wall of 15 feet of water wiped away fromport, Ore., A city just outside Portland that had housed thousands of shipyard workers during the Second World War. The destruction left 18,000 people homeless and started negotiations with Canada about how to better manage the Columbia River.

    On one of the last days in function of President Dwight D. Eisenhower, he signed the Columbia River Treaty, which traded between two priorities: Canada agreed to build in various dams that would bear most of the flood control for the United States, and America voted in the river of the extra electricity to be able to handle the extra electricity from the extra electricity to be the extra of the extra the extra electricity by the extra electricity that is extra of the extra electricity from the extra the extra electricity that is extra of the extra electricity the extra of the extra electricity the extra the extra of the extra electricity the extra of the extra electricity the extra the extra of the extra electricity that the extra electricity is to be able to handle the extra electricity from the extra electricity from the extra electricity by the extra electricity that of the extra electricity that is to be able to handle the extra electricity from the extra electricity by the extra electricity by the extra of the extra electricity that the extra electricity that is to be able to handle the extra electricity from the extra electricity by the extra electricity by the extra electricity that the extra electricity that is to be able to use the extra electricity by the extra electricity by the extra electricity. About American ladies.

    The original pact came into force in the fall of 1964, with some provisions that end after 60 years.

    The discussions to update the treaty before sharing in 2024 expired during the first Trump administration. Mr. Biden paused them briefly and then resumed. In March 2023, the entire congress delegation from the Pacific Northwest insisted on getting a deal. After the slow start, the United States and Canada announced the rough contours of agreement last summer that reflected a reality that was very different from the treaty writers in the 1960s.

    The one was generated under the original treaty, eventually was much more valuable than originally expected, with half of Canada a total of around $ 300 million a year. That was much more than necessary, so Canada sold a lot of power back to the United States, much to the annoyance of American utilities.

    The updated plan has reduced the Take of Canada about half over time. This enables the United States to maintain more power, just as the demand for energy is growing for the first time in decades.

    The cheap, clean hydropower of the river has been an important draw for technology companies that want to build data centers over the past two decades, even more as artificial intelligence increases their hunger for power.

    “The country as a whole must understand how important the Pacific Northwest is in that emerging image,” said David Kennedy, who studies the history of the region in Stanford.

    In exchange, Canada decreased under the updated treaty how much water it had to guarantee to store for flood management, giving it flexibility to prioritize the communities and ecosystems around the reservoirs. The original treaty created drastic fluctuations in the height of the water, so that miles of dirt was exposed when the water was pulled to prepare for snow melting.

    “Every year this dry soil creates terrible dust problems,” a resident told Valemount, British Columbia, Mr Dix in the town hall.

    The new plan created more stable heights for the reservoirs so that Canada can restore the ecosystems along the coasts and create better recreation.

    The negotiations include indigenous tribes, which had no control in the first treaty, even if their fishing grounds and cities were decimated by dams.

    Jay Johnson, a Canadian negotiator of the Syilx Okanagan Nation, said in the virtual town hall that the tribes on both sides of the border found common ground when repairing salmon migration. The updated plan created provisions for extra water in dry years, which he called 'essential for the chances of survival of salmon, in particular in the context of climate change'.

    In the fall, when some provisions of the original treaty expire, the countries signed an interim agreement of three years, although parts still require extra conference credits. A decade must cancel on both sides before he leaves the treaty.

    “It offers benefits on both sides of the border, and absent that treaty, you have many problems,” said Jonathan Wilkinson, Canada's Energy and Natural Resources Minister, in an interview.

    Nobody is pretty sure what will happen. Some of the people who worked on the deal were still in force, but Mr. Trump has not yet appointed an assistant secretary for matters in the Western hemisphere. The situation is all the more precarious because of Mr Trump's attempt to reduce the workforce in important federal agencies involved in the treaty discussions, including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the Federal Power Authority.

    With the negotiations in the air, people in the vicinity of the conversations in the region are hopeful that the updated Convention can still be resolved.

    Barbara Cosens, Professor of Law at the University of Idaho, said that although the Trump government may not care about Zalmhabitats or the involvement of indigenous groups. Water can flow downstream, but swimming salmon upstream, so keeping environmental provisions in the game can cause American leverage, said Mrs. Cosens.

    And supporters point to years of two -part support from senators Maria Cantwell van Washington, the ranking list Democrat in the Senate Trade Committee, and Jim Risch van Idaho, the Republican chairman of the Senate Committee for Foreign Relations.

    “There is no daylight between the Republicans and Democrats on this,” says Scott Simms, Chief Executive of the Public Power Council, which represents the utilities of consumers in the region.

    The deployment is not hypothetical. In 1996, after heavy snow, a so-called pineapple express storm dumped warm rain in the Portland area and unleashed a stream of water. The Army Corps of Engineers worked for days and manipulated more than 60 dams in the Columbia River system with its partners in Canada to keep water at a distance.

    A smaller river that flows into the Columbia still flowed over and killed eight people. With improvised dikes built from plywood and sandbags, Portland's Downtown was hardly spared.

    Ivan Penn Contributed report from Houston, and Matina Stevis-Gridneff from Toronto.