Skip to content

Can the Federal Reserve look beyond Trump's rates?

    As President Trump's efforts to restructure the global trading system with vast rates, start to take shape, one question remains dog officials at the Federal Reserve: how will this policy influence the plans of the Central Bank to lower interest rates?

    An influential Fed Gouverneur made it clear on Monday that he did not expect Mr. Trump's policy to derail the efforts of the Fed to get inflation under control, which suggests that, instead, this year's fresh interest rates are still in play .

    “My basic line is that every imposition of rates will only increase the prices and in a non -persistent way,” said Christopher J. Waller, the civil servant, in comments at an event in Australia on Monday evening. “So I prefer to look through these effects when setting the monetary policy to the best of its ability.”

    Economists are concerned that rates, which are essentially taxes on American consumers, will increase prices in the United States, at least temporarily, and delay economic growth over time.

    Mr Waller acknowledged that the economic impact of the rates could be greater than expected, depending on how they are structured and later set up. But he suggested that any increase in prices of rates could be coordinated by other policy that “could have positive delivery effects and put it down on inflation.”

    Mr Waller's views are important, given that he is one of the seven officials who form the board of directors and vote during each policy meeting.

    In addition to rates, Mr Trump has made increasing domestic energy production, deregulation and tax reduction other pillars of his economic agenda. His administration also pursues mass deportations of illegal immigrants and government spending cuts through, partly, reducing the federal workforce.

    FED officials so far have hesitated hesitantly to conclude exactly what these changes will mean for the economy and ultimately the path ahead for interest rates. The loan costs amount to 4.25 percent and 4.5 percent after the FED had chosen last month against further cutbacks until it was more confident that inflation was indeed under control.

    The last time the central bank was dealing with a long-term tit-for-tat trade war was in 2018, during the first term of Mr Trump in the White House. Yet the economic background could no longer look different with today.

    Inflation was modest and consistently endorsed the goal of the FEDs 2 percent. The interest rates were much lower in comparison and float around 2 percent. The prospects for economic growth had also become gloomy when companies withdrew their investments in large ticket. This dynamic gave the Fed flexibility to respond preventively to ward off a much greater delay in the United States, and by the end of 2019 it had reduced the interest rates with three -quarters of a percentage point.

    This time PlayBook “look through” could retain as worries about a hit to grow rates overshadow, which could simply be a temporary increase in consumer prices. But consumers still feel the after -effects of the worst inflation shock in about four decades and remain on the outskirts of future price increases, so that the situation for policy makers is complicated.

    FED officials received more unwanted news on the inflation front last week after the latest report from the consumer price index has shown that the price pressure was warming up again in January. The most important perpetrators were rising supermarket prices, higher led with an increase in egg prices by 15 percent due to the constant outbreak of bird flu and rising energy costs.

    Even once those fleeting items extended, the so -called “core” inflation rose at the fastest pace in about two years in about two years.

    The alarm was facilitated after the release of the producer Price Index, which follows what companies pay in goods and services to make what they are selling. That index suggested that overall inflation, measured by the preferred spending of the FED of the FED, was more modest than initially feared.

    Mr. Waller characterized the data as “slightly disappointing” and said that inflation was still far above the goal of the Fed in the midst of “unbearable slow” progress in the direction of that goal in the past year.

    But he aroused doubts about which signals to draw on the most recent data. The growth of the consumer prize is the tendency to run high at the beginning of the year before he slows down in the second half, of which Mr Waller and other economists think they can be attributed to seasonal peculiarities that can cover up the real pace.

    Research by the economists of the Central Bank show that this dynamic took place in 16 of the last 22 years. In a separate speech on Monday, Patrick Harker, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, also noticed that CPI inflation in January exceeded expectations nine out of 10 times in the past decade.

    “If this winter stable is temporary, as was last year, then further policy dependence will be appropriate,” Mr. Waller said in his comments. “But until that is clear, I prefer to keep the policy percentage stable.”

    Michelle Bowman, another Fed Gouverneur, confirmed her support on Monday for a “cautious and gradual” approach of extra cuts. Mrs Bowman said that while she was waiting for further evidence that inflation was moderating, she still expected that this would happen this year. That is a position that most of the central bank officials have adopted to a certain extent, encouraged by a solid labor market.

    Mrs Bowman said that she also wanted “clarity” about what the Trump government has planned.

    “It will be very important to have a better picture of this policy, how they will be implemented, and to establish more confidence about how the economy will react in the coming weeks and months,” she said. Mrs Bowman became just like Mr. Waller during his first term appointed as the Fed by Mr. Trump.

    The president and his employees have adopted a more measured tone when they are talking about their ability to tame inflation, after they have sworn to overcome it on “Day 1.”

    Kevin Hassett, the director of the National Economic Council of Mr Trump, told CBS News on Sunday that the administration has a “versatile plan to terminate inflation”, specific tax reductions, efforts of the billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk for government spending, Deregulation and increased energy production.

    Nevertheless, investors have reduced their expectations for how much the FED will lower the rates this year. They have also pushed the timing back from those movements on worries taken together, Mr Trump's policy will lead to higher inflation. Now Futures -markets point to a reduction of only a quarter point in December.

    Mr. Harker said on Monday that he was 'optimistic', not only that inflation would fall over time, but that the interest rates could “fall in the long term.”

    “This does not mean that there are no areas of potential care,” he added. “In fact, the only thing I can say with any certainty is that there are many uncertainties.”